Tinjauan Sistematis terhadap Kompetensi TIK dan Teknologi Pembelajaran dalam Meningkatkan Inovasi Pengajaran
Keywords:
Inovasi Pengajaran, Kompetensi Tik, Systematic Literature Review, Teknologi Pembelajaran, TpackAbstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menyajikan tinjauan sistematis terhadap literatur ilmiah terkini mengenai peran kompetensi Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi (TIK) dan teknologi pembelajaran dalam mendorong inovasi pengajaran. Metode yang digunakan adalah Systematic Literature Review (SLR) dengan pendekatan protokol PRISMA, yang mencakup identifikasi, seleksi, kelayakan, dan inklusi terhadap artikel-artikel ilmiah yang dipublikasikan antara tahun 2018 hingga 2025. Sumber data diperoleh dari database bereputasi seperti Scopus, Web of Science, DOAJ, dan Google Scholar, dengan kriteria inklusi mencakup fokus pada kompetensi TIK, teknologi pembelajaran, dan inovasi dalam konteks pengajaran. Analisis data dilakukan menggunakan pendekatan koding tematik berdasarkan kerangka teori TPACK, SAMR Model, dan Diffusion of Innovation Theory. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa kompetensi TIK guru/dosen berkontribusi signifikan terhadap pemanfaatan teknologi pembelajaran yang inovatif, seperti Learning Management System (LMS), Augmented Reality (AR), gamifikasi, dan alat berbasis kecerdasan buatan (AI). Temuan juga mengungkapkan bahwa inovasi pengajaran lebih berhasil ketika pendidik memiliki kompetensi TIK yang kuat, serta didukung pelatihan berbasis kebutuhan nyata dan kebijakan pendidikan yang terintegrasi dengan teknologi. Kajian ini memberikan kontribusi penting dalam memetakan tren riset, mengidentifikasi kesenjangan literatur, dan memberikan dasar pengembangan profesional guru serta kebijakan kurikulum berbasis teknologi. Penelitian selanjutnya disarankan untuk mengeksplorasi konteks lokal, efektivitas program pelatihan TPACK, dan dampak penggunaan teknologi spesifik terhadap hasil belajar peserta didik.
References
Aguayo, C., Eames, C., & Cochrane, T. (2021). A framework for mobile learning in teacher education. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 37(2), 21–36.
Alghamdi, A. K. H. (2021). Teachers’ perceptions of integrating technology in education: A review. Education and Information Technologies, 26(3), 2885–2901.
Barrot, J. S. (2022). Teachers’ digital literacy and teaching competence: Evidence from the Philippines. Computers and Education Open, 3, 100065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2021.100065
Bond, M., Zawacki-Richter, O., & Nichols, M. (2020). Revisiting five decades of educational technology research: A content and authorship analysis of the British Journal of Educational Technology. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(3), 612–630.
Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H. L., & Tsai, C.-C. (2020). A review of TPACK research in science education: Implications for future directions. Journal of Computers in Education, 7(1), 1–23.
Chen, X., Zou, D., Xie, H., & Wang, F. L. (2020). Past, present, and future of smart learning: A systematic review. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(4), 567–586. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1740214
Dexter, S. (2021). Leadership for technology integration: Factors influencing effective technology leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 57(5), 741–774.
Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2020). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 52(3), 255–271.
European Commission. (2022). Digital Education Action Plan (2021–2027). Brussels: European Union.
Greenhalgh, T., Wherton, J., Papoutsi, C., Lynch, J., & Hughes, G. (2021). Beyond adoption: A new framework for theorizing and evaluating nonadoption, abandonment, and challenges to the scale-up, spread, and sustainability of health and education technologies. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23(11), e22450.
Hamilton, E. R., Rosenberg, J. M., & Akcaoglu, M. (2020). The Substitution Augmentation Modification Redefinition (SAMR) Model: A critical review and suggestions for its use. TechTrends, 64, 372–379.
Hong, Q. N., Pluye, P., Fàbregues, S., Bartlett, G., Boardman, F., Cargo, M., ... & Vedel, I. (2018). Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT), version 2018. McGill University.
Huang, R. H., Liu, D. J., Tlili, A., Koper, R., & Zhang, X. (2023). State of the art and future trends of smart learning environments. Smart Learning Environments, 10(1), 5.
Ibáñez, M. B., & Delgado-Kloos, C. (2020). Augmented reality for STEM learning: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 159, 104009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104009
Ilomäki, L., & Lakkala, M. (2020). Digital competence as a boundary concept: Crossing and integrating the boundaries between policy, education and technology. Education and Information Technologies, 25(3), 691–702. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09940-1
Kebritchi, M. (2022). Supporting faculty in online instruction. Online Learning Journal, 26(1), 123–139.
König, J., Jäger-Biela, D. J., & Glutsch, N. (2020). Adapting to online teaching during COVID-19 school closures: Teacher education and digital competence. European Journal of Teacher Education, 43(4), 608–622. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1809650
Martín-Martín, A., Thelwall, M., Orduna-Malea, E., & Delgado López-Cózar, E. (2021). Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories. Journal of Informetrics, 15(3), 101132.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2020). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Mishra, P. (2020). Considering contextual knowledge: The TPACK diagram gets an upgrade. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 36(2), 76–78.
Mtebe, J. S., & Raisamo, R. (2020). A model for assessing ICT competence of instructors in higher education institutions. International Journal of Education and Development using ICT, 16(1).
Ng, W. (2022). New digital technologies in education: Conceptualizing professional learning for educators. Springer.
Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1609406917733847.
O’Flaherty, J., & Phillips, C. (2021). The use of flipped classrooms in higher education: A scoping review. The Internet and Higher Education, 48, 100783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2020.100783
OECD. (2021). 21st Century Teachers: Developing ICT Competency in a Changing Education Landscape. OECD Publishing.
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., ... & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Puentedura, R. (2021). SAMR and TPCK: A hands-on approach to classroom practice. Retrieved from https://hippasus.com/resources.html
Redecker, C. (2021). European framework for the digital competence of educators: DigCompEdu. Joint Research Centre Science for Policy Report, EU.
Rogers, E. M. (2020). Diffusion of Innovations (5th ed.). Free Press. (Original work published 2003)
Susanto, H., Lestari, D., & Rahayu, S. (2021). The impact of digital transformation in Indonesian education: Readiness and challenges. Journal of Educational Technology, 22(2), 95–108.
Tondeur, J., Aesaert, K., Prestridge, S., & Consuegra, E. (2021). A multilevel analysis of what matters in professional development for technology integration: The role of teacher, school, and training design. Computers & Education, 172, 104236.
UNESCO. (2023). Guidelines for ICT Competency Standards for Teachers (ICT-CST). Paris: UNESCO Publishing.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Halimah Dewi (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
